Skip to content

6,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat Love Nala Tuna Recipe Plus Cat Treats Mousse

Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat scores higher on KibbleLab, 8.2 to 7.4. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat and Love Nala Tuna Recipe Plus Cat Treats Mousse compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat
Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat

Verified Jul 25, 2026

Love Nala Tuna Recipe Plus Cat Treats Mousse
Love Nala Tuna Recipe Plus Cat Treats Mousse

Verified Jul 20, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science. No one can pay for a higher score.
8.2 / 10 7.4 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
26.50% Not listed
Fat 0.80% Not listed
Fiber 0.50% Not listed
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
71.00% Not listed
Calories 1277 kcal/kg Not listed
Calorie density Low Not listed
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Tuna, Natural Tuna Flavored Broth, Tapioca Starch, Guar Gum, Vitamin E Supplement, Green Tea Extract Water, Tuna, Tapioca Starch, Guar Gum, Tuna Extract, Tuna Oil, Taurine, Vitamin E Supplement
Limited ingredient No No
Health focus Hydration support, Immune support, Antioxidant support Skin coat health
Format & suitability
Food type Treat Treat
Texture Whole Pieces Mousse
Processing Grilled Not listed
Life stage All Life Stages Adult
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
Not indicated Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No Yes
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record KibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear.
None None
Where to buy
Amazon
Amazon

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Tuna
  • Tapioca Starch
  • Guar Gum
  • Vitamin E

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to see Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat and Love Nala Tuna Recipe Plus Cat Treats Mousse scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat scores higher, 8.2 to 7.4 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science, and no one can pay for a higher score.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Tuna, Tapioca Starch, Guar Gum, Vitamin E.

See the full profiles: Inaba Extra Tender Tuna in Tuna Flavored Broth Treat and Love Nala Tuna Recipe Plus Cat Treats Mousse .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.