I and Love and You Ear Candy Beef Ear Chews Treat Redbarn Bully Coated Cow Ears Treat
I and Love and You Ear Candy Beef Ear Chews Treat scores higher on KibbleLab, 9.3 to 7.5. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.
I and Love and You Ear Candy Beef Ear Chews Treat and Redbarn Bully Coated Cow Ears Treat compared
| Attribute |
Verified Aug 18, 2026 |
Verified Jul 21, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
KibbleLab scoreThe KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science. |
9.3 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Guaranteed analysis (as fed) | ||
ProteinGuaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed. |
83.00% | 70.00% |
| Fat | 4.00% | 3.00% |
| Fiber | 8.00% | 3.00% |
MoistureHigher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above. |
5.00% | 12.00% |
| Calories | 3384 kcal/kg | 3041 kcal/kg |
| Calorie density | Moderate | Low |
| Ingredients | ||
Full ingredient listEvery ingredient on each label, in order of weight. |
beef cow ears |
Beef Ear, Beef Liver, Egg White, Beef Pizzle, Fructose, Chicken Fat (preserved with Mixed Tocopherols), Caramel Color, Chicken Cartilage, Sunflower Lecithin, Salmon Oil, Ascorbic Acid, Vitamin E Supplement, Dried Blueberries, Dried Cranberries. Show full list Show less |
| Limited ingredient | No | No |
| Marketed benefits | Dental care, Joint care, Digestive health | Joint care, Dental care |
| Format & suitability | ||
| Food type | Treat | Treat |
| Texture | Whole Pieces | Whole Pieces |
| Processing | Not listed | Not listed |
| Life stage | Adult | All Life Stages |
| Breed size | All Breed Sizes | All Breed Sizes |
| AAFCO nutritional adequacy | ||
Complete & balancedWhether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test. |
No | Not indicated |
| Life stages | Not listed | Not listed |
SubstantiationHow adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile. |
Not listed | Not listed |
| Maker standards | ||
WSAVA guidelinesThe World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands. |
No | No |
PSC accreditedThe Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality. |
No | No |
| Recalls & where to buy | ||
Recalls on recordWe track the FDA's animal food recall listings back to January 2019 and publish every pet food recall automatically. A filing that isn't pet food may not appear here. |
None | None |
| Where to buy | ||
Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Shared ingredients
Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.
- Beef Ear
Not sure which is right for your pet?
Sign in free to save favorites and compare foods side by side. Add KL+ to see I and Love and You Ear Candy Beef Ear Chews Treat and Redbarn Bully Coated Cow Ears Treat scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus.
Common Questions
Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?
I and Love and You Ear Candy Beef Ear Chews Treat scores higher, 9.3 to 7.5 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.
Do these two foods share ingredients?
Yes. They share these top ingredients: Beef Ear.
Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?
I and Love and You Ear Candy Beef Ear Chews Treat is not; Redbarn Bully Coated Cow Ears Treat does not list an AAFCO status.
See the full profiles: I and Love and You Ear Candy Beef Ear Chews Treat and Redbarn Bully Coated Cow Ears Treat .
KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.
This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.
Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.