Skip to content

8,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Applaws Tuna Fillet Chewy Cat Treats FirstMate Indulgent Duck Cat Treats

Both score 9.3 out of 10 on KibbleLab. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Applaws Tuna Fillet Chewy Cat Treats and FirstMate Indulgent Duck Cat Treats compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Applaws Tuna Fillet Chewy Cat Treats
Applaws Tuna Fillet Chewy Cat Treats

Verified Oct 11, 2026

FirstMate Indulgent Duck Cat Treats
FirstMate Indulgent Duck Cat Treats

Verified Aug 28, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
9.3 / 10 9.3 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
29.00% 31.00%
Fat 11.00% 12.00%
Fiber 2.00% 3.00%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
27.00% 10.00%
Calories 3167 kcal/kg 3225 kcal/kg
Calorie density Low Low
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Tuna Fillet, Glycerin, Potato Starch, Chicken Fat, Fish Oil, Natural Fish Flavor, Gelatin, Fish Broth, Citric Acid (Natural Preservative).
Duck Meal, Burbank Potato, Norkotah Potato, Chicken Fat (preserved with mixed tocopherols), Whole Blueberries, Brewer's Dried Yeast, Calcium Propionate (a preservative), Rosemary extract Show full list
Limited ingredient Yes Yes
Marketed benefits Heart care, Eye health, Skin coat health Allergy support, Sensitive stomach, Antioxidant support, Urinary care, Weight management
Format & suitability
Food type Treat Treat
Texture Soft Chew Crunchy
Processing Not listed Not listed
Life stage Adult All Life Stages
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
Not indicated Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
Yes No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record We track the FDA's animal food recall listings back to January 2019 and publish every pet food recall automatically. A filing that isn't pet food may not appear here.
None None
Where to buy
Amazon
Shop Chewy Amazon

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Chicken Fat

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to save favorites and compare foods side by side. Add KL+ to see Applaws Tuna Fillet Chewy Cat Treats and FirstMate Indulgent Duck Cat Treats scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Both foods score 9.3 out of 10 on KibbleLab.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Chicken Fat.

See the full profiles: Applaws Tuna Fillet Chewy Cat Treats and FirstMate Indulgent Duck Cat Treats .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.