Blue Buffalo Wilderness Crunchy Chicken Cat Treats Weruva Chicken Savory Crunchies Treats
Blue Buffalo Wilderness Crunchy Chicken Cat Treats scores higher on KibbleLab, 8.2 to 7.8. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.
Blue Buffalo Wilderness Crunchy Chicken Cat Treats and Weruva Chicken Savory Crunchies Treats compared
| Attribute |
Verified Jul 25, 2026 |
Verified Jul 29, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
KibbleLab scoreThe KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science. No one can pay for a higher score. |
8.2 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| Guaranteed analysis (as fed) | ||
ProteinGuaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed. |
28.00% | 28.00% |
| Fat | 12.00% | 12.00% |
| Fiber | 4.00% | 4.00% |
MoistureHigher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above. |
10.00% | 10.00% |
| Calories | 3800 kcal/kg | 3671 kcal/kg |
| Calorie density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Ingredients | ||
Full ingredient listEvery ingredient on each label, in order of weight. |
Deboned Chicken, Chicken Meal, Potato Starch, Peas, Brewers Dried Yeast, Chicken Fat, Natural Flavor, Citric Acid, Potassium Chloride, Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols, Oil Of Rosemary. Show full list Show less |
Chicken, Chicken Meal, Tapioca Starch, Peas, Pea Protein, Chickpeas, Flaxseed, Pumpkin, Salmon Oil, Chicken Fat (Preserved With Tocopherols), Natural Flavor, Lactic Acid. Show full list Show less |
| Limited ingredient | No | No |
| Health focus | High energy | Skin coat health |
| Format & suitability | ||
| Food type | Treat | Treat |
| Texture | Crunchy | Crunchy |
| Processing | Baked | Not listed |
| Life stage | Adult | Adult |
| Breed size | All Breed Sizes | All Breed Sizes |
| AAFCO nutritional adequacy | ||
Complete & balancedWhether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test. |
No | No |
| Life stages | Not listed | Not listed |
SubstantiationHow adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile. |
Not listed | Not listed |
| Maker standards | ||
WSAVA guidelinesThe World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands. |
No | No |
PSC accreditedThe Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality. |
No | No |
| Recalls & where to buy | ||
Recalls on recordKibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear. |
None | None |
| Where to buy | ||
Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Shared ingredients
Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.
- Chicken
- Pea
- Chicken Fat
Not sure which is right for your pet?
Sign in free to see Blue Buffalo Wilderness Crunchy Chicken Cat Treats and Weruva Chicken Savory Crunchies Treats scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.
Common Questions
Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?
Blue Buffalo Wilderness Crunchy Chicken Cat Treats scores higher, 8.2 to 7.8 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science, and no one can pay for a higher score.
Do these two foods share ingredients?
Yes. They share these top ingredients: Chicken, Pea, Chicken Fat.
Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?
Neither food is labeled AAFCO complete and balanced.
See the full profiles: Blue Buffalo Wilderness Crunchy Chicken Cat Treats and Weruva Chicken Savory Crunchies Treats .
KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.
This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.
Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.

