Cats in the Kitchen Chicken Bisque Treat Weruva Wx Formulas Wx Phos Focused Chicken & Tilapia Lickable Cat Treat
Weruva Wx Formulas Wx Phos Focused Chicken & Tilapia Lickable Cat Treat scores higher on KibbleLab, 9.3 to 8.0. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.
Cats in the Kitchen Chicken Bisque Treat and Weruva Wx Formulas Wx Phos Focused Chicken & Tilapia Lickable Cat Treat compared
| Attribute |
Verified Aug 28, 2026 |
|
|---|---|---|
KibbleLab scoreThe KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science. |
8.0 / 10 | 9.3 / 10 |
| Guaranteed analysis (as fed) | ||
ProteinGuaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed. |
5.00% | 7.00% |
| Fat | 4.00% | 5.00% |
| Fiber | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Phosphorus | Not listed | 0.05% |
MoistureHigher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above. |
86.00% | 82.00% |
| Calories | 848 kcal/kg | 1101 kcal/kg |
| Calorie density | Low | Low |
| Ingredients | ||
Full ingredient listEvery ingredient on each label, in order of weight. |
Chicken Bone Broth, Chicken, Tapioca Starch, Egg Product, Guar Gum, Natural Flavor | Chicken Broth, Egg White, Chicken, Chicken Fat, Tilapia, Tapioca Starch, Yeast Extract, Guar Gum, Fish Oil, Celery Powder. |
| Limited ingredient | No | No |
| Marketed benefits | Hydration support | Appetite support, Kidney care |
| Format & suitability | ||
| Food type | Treat | Treat |
| Texture | Pate | Paste |
| Processing | Not listed | Not listed |
| Life stage | Kitten, Adult, Senior | Adult, Senior |
| Breed size | All Breed Sizes | All Breed Sizes |
| AAFCO nutritional adequacy | ||
Complete & balancedWhether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test. |
Not indicated | Not indicated |
| Life stages | Not listed | Not listed |
SubstantiationHow adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile. |
Not listed | Not listed |
| Maker standards | ||
WSAVA guidelinesThe World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands. |
No | Not indicated |
PSC accreditedThe Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality. |
No | No |
| Recalls & where to buy | ||
Recalls on recordWe track the FDA's animal food recall listings back to January 2019 and publish every pet food recall automatically. A filing that isn't pet food may not appear here. |
None | None |
| Where to buy | ||
Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Shared ingredients
Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.
- Chicken
- Tapioca Starch
- Guar Gum
Not sure which is right for your pet?
Sign in free to save favorites and compare foods side by side. Add KL+ to see Cats in the Kitchen Chicken Bisque Treat and Weruva Wx Formulas Wx Phos Focused Chicken & Tilapia Lickable Cat Treat scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus.
Common Questions
Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?
Weruva Wx Formulas Wx Phos Focused Chicken & Tilapia Lickable Cat Treat scores higher, 9.3 to 8.0 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.
Do these two foods share ingredients?
Yes. They share these top ingredients: Chicken, Tapioca Starch, Guar Gum.
See the full profiles: Cats in the Kitchen Chicken Bisque Treat and Weruva Wx Formulas Wx Phos Focused Chicken & Tilapia Lickable Cat Treat .
KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.
This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.
Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.