Skip to content

6,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Almo Nature Salmon and Chicken in Broth Wet Cat Food Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food

Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food scores higher on KibbleLab, 7.6 to 7.4. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Almo Nature Salmon and Chicken in Broth Wet Cat Food and Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Almo Nature Salmon and Chicken in Broth Wet Cat Food
Almo Nature Salmon and Chicken in Broth Wet Cat Food

Verified Jul 21, 2026

Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food
Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food

Verified Jul 19, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science. No one can pay for a higher score.
7.4 / 10 7.6 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
17.50% 11.00%
Fat 1.00% 0.50%
Fiber 1.00% 1.00%
Calcium Not listed 0.17 g/100g
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
78.00% 85.00%
Calories 690 kcal/kg Not listed
Calorie density Low Not listed
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Salmon, Chicken, Water Sufficient For Processing Chicken, Salmon, Modified Tapioca Starch, Gum, Taurine and Vitamin Supplements, Trace Minerals.
Limited ingredient Yes No
Format & suitability
Food type Wet Wet
Texture Chunks In Broth Shredded
Processing Canned Canned
Life stage Adult, Senior All Life Stages
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
No Yes
Life stages Not listed All Life Stages
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record KibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear.
None None
Where to buy

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Salmon
  • Chicken

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to see Almo Nature Salmon and Chicken in Broth Wet Cat Food and Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food scores higher, 7.6 to 7.4 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science, and no one can pay for a higher score.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Salmon, Chicken.

Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?

Almo Nature Salmon and Chicken in Broth Wet Cat Food is not; Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food is labeled complete and balanced.

See the full profiles: Almo Nature Salmon and Chicken in Broth Wet Cat Food and Snappy Tom Lites Chicken With Salmon Wet Cat Food .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.