Skip to content

8,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Aniwell Dental Powder Topper Jinx Salmon & Pumpkin Topper Crumbles

Aniwell Dental Powder Topper scores higher on KibbleLab, 9.0 to 8.0. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Aniwell Dental Powder Topper and Jinx Salmon & Pumpkin Topper Crumbles compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Aniwell Dental Powder Topper
Aniwell Dental Powder Topper

Verified Aug 18, 2026

Jinx Salmon & Pumpkin Topper Crumbles
Jinx Salmon & Pumpkin Topper Crumbles

Verified Oct 12, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
9.0 / 10 8.0 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
Not listed 20.00%
Fat Not listed 8.00%
Fiber Not listed 3.00%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
Not listed 18.00%
Calories Not listed 2938 kcal/kg
Calorie density Not listed Low
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Tea Polyphenols (Green Tea Extract), Mannitol, Zinc Methionine Complex, Taurine, Lysozyme, Oligosaccharides, Flaxseed, Citric Acid, Coconut Oil, Garbanzo Flour, Sunflower Lecithin, Rosemary Extract, Chicken Flavor Show full list
Salmon, Ground Grain Sorghum, Coconut Glycerin, Gelatin, Pumpkin, Dried Citrus Pulp, Salt, Citric Acid (Preservative), Vinegar, Mixed Tocopherols (Preservative), Rosemary Extract Show full list
Limited ingredient No Yes
Marketed benefits Breath support, Dental care Digestive health, Appetite support, Bone health
Format & suitability
Food type Topper Topper
Texture Powder Crumbles
Processing Not listed Dehydrated
Life stage All Life Stages All Life Stages
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
Not indicated Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
Not indicated No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record We track the FDA's animal food recall listings back to January 2019 and publish every pet food recall automatically. A filing that isn't pet food may not appear here.
None None
Where to buy
Shop Aniwell Shop Chewy Amazon
Shop Chewy Amazon

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Citric Acid

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to save favorites and compare foods side by side. Add KL+ to see Aniwell Dental Powder Topper and Jinx Salmon & Pumpkin Topper Crumbles scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Aniwell Dental Powder Topper scores higher, 9.0 to 8.0 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Citric Acid.

See the full profiles: Aniwell Dental Powder Topper and Jinx Salmon & Pumpkin Topper Crumbles .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.