Skip to content

7,500+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Caru Classics Beef Bone Broth Topper Open Farm Grass-Fed Beef Bone Broth Cat Topper

Both score 8.0 out of 10 on KibbleLab. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Caru Classics Beef Bone Broth Topper and Open Farm Grass-Fed Beef Bone Broth Cat Topper compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Caru Classics Beef Bone Broth Topper
Caru Classics Beef Bone Broth Topper

Verified Aug 30, 2026

Open Farm Grass-Fed Beef Bone Broth Cat Topper
Open Farm Grass-Fed Beef Bone Broth Cat Topper
KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
8.0 / 10 8.0 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
3.00% Not listed
Fat 0.01% Not listed
Fiber 1.00% 1.00%
Omega-3 0.01% Not listed
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
97.50% 97.00%
Calories 150 kcal/kg 160 kcal/kg
Calorie density Low Low
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Water Sufficient for Processing, Beef Bones, Organic Carrots, Marine Microalgae Oil (Source of Omega-3 Fatty Acids), Organic Celery, Organic Parsley, Apple Cider Vinegar, Black Peppercorn, Thyme. Show full list
Beef Bone Broth, Carrots, Pumpkin, Parsley
Limited ingredient No No
Marketed benefits Not listed Hydration support, Joint care, Digestive health, Skin coat health, Immune support, Appetite support
Format & suitability
Food type Topper Topper
Texture Broth Broth
Processing Gently Cooked Slow Cooked
Life stage Adult Kitten, Adult, Senior
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
No Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No Yes
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record We track the FDA's animal food recall listings back to January 2019 and publish every pet food recall automatically. A filing that isn't pet food may not appear here.
None None
Where to buy
Shop Chewy Amazon
Amazon

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Carrot
  • Parsley

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to save favorites and compare foods side by side. Add KL+ to see Caru Classics Beef Bone Broth Topper and Open Farm Grass-Fed Beef Bone Broth Cat Topper scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Both foods score 8.0 out of 10 on KibbleLab.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Carrot, Parsley.

Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?

Caru Classics Beef Bone Broth Topper is not; Open Farm Grass-Fed Beef Bone Broth Cat Topper does not list an AAFCO status.

See the full profiles: Caru Classics Beef Bone Broth Topper and Open Farm Grass-Fed Beef Bone Broth Cat Topper .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.