Skip to content

6,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper Tiki Pets Chicken Recipe Bisque Topper

Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper scores higher on KibbleLab, 8.0 to 7.5. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper and Tiki Pets Chicken Recipe Bisque Topper compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper
Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper

Verified Aug 2, 2026

Tiki Pets Chicken Recipe Bisque Topper
Tiki Pets Chicken Recipe Bisque Topper

Verified Jul 25, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
8.0 / 10 7.5 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
9.00% 7.00%
Fat 7.00% 3.00%
Fiber 1.50% 0.00%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
78.00% 84.00%
Calories Not listed Not listed
Calorie density Low Not listed
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
New formula: Chicken, Water Sufficient for Processing, Guar Gum, Natural Flavor Chicken broth, chicken, sunflower oil, fish extracts, natural tuna flavor, natural chicken flavor, xanthan gum, dried egg.
Limited ingredient Yes No
Health focus Hydration support, Urinary care Appetite support, Hydration support, Skin coat health, Antioxidant support
Format & suitability
Food type Topper Topper
Texture Pate Chunks In Gravy
Processing Canned Not listed
Life stage All Life Stages All Life Stages
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
Not indicated No
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record KibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear.
None None
Where to buy
Amazon
Amazon

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Chicken

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to see Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper and Tiki Pets Chicken Recipe Bisque Topper scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper scores higher, 8.0 to 7.5 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Chicken.

Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?

Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper does not list an AAFCO status; Tiki Pets Chicken Recipe Bisque Topper is not.

See the full profiles: Health Extension Grain Free 95% Chicken Topper and Tiki Pets Chicken Recipe Bisque Topper .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.