Skip to content

7,500+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

PawCo Magic Topper Hip & Joint Powder Topper YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper

YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper scores higher on KibbleLab, 9.3 to 9.0. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

PawCo Magic Topper Hip & Joint Powder Topper and YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
PawCo Magic Topper Hip & Joint Powder Topper
PawCo Magic Topper Hip & Joint Powder Topper

Verified Aug 24, 2026

YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper
YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper
KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
9.0 / 10 9.3 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
Not listed 39.00%
Fat Not listed 5.00%
Fiber Not listed 20.00%
Omega-3 0.05% Not listed
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
8.00% 1.00%
Calories Not listed Not listed
Calorie density Not listed Moderate
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Nutritional Yeast, Carrot, Pumpkin, Sweet Potato, Marine Microalgae (Source of Omega-3 Fatty Acids), Natural Flavor
Nutritional yeast, chicken bone broth, burdock root, echinacea purpurea root, fennel seed, organic cordyceps mushroom, organic reishi mushroom, chamomile flower, quercetin dihydrate, organic amla fruit, tinospora cordifolia Show full list
Limited ingredient No No
Marketed benefits Joint care, Mobility support, Immune support, Digestive health Allergy support, Immune support
Format & suitability
Food type Topper Topper
Texture Powder Powder
Processing Not listed Not listed
Life stage Adult, Senior Adult, Puppy, Senior
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
Not indicated Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
Yes No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record We track the FDA's animal food recall listings back to January 2019 and publish every pet food recall automatically. A filing that isn't pet food may not appear here.
None None
Where to buy
Amazon
Shop YumWoof Amazon

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Nutritional Yeast

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to save favorites and compare foods side by side. Add KL+ to see PawCo Magic Topper Hip & Joint Powder Topper and YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper scores higher, 9.3 to 9.0 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Nutritional Yeast.

See the full profiles: PawCo Magic Topper Hip & Joint Powder Topper and YumWoof Perfect Immunity Topper .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.