Skip to content

6,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat Bil-Jac Slim-Jacs Treats

Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat scores higher on KibbleLab, 8.2 to 7.5. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat and Bil-Jac Slim-Jacs Treats compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat
Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat

Verified Jul 27, 2026

Bil-Jac Slim-Jacs Treats
Bil-Jac Slim-Jacs Treats

Verified Jul 25, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science. No one can pay for a higher score.
8.2 / 10 7.5 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
Not listed 23.00%
Fat Not listed 4.00%
Fiber Not listed 2.00%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
10.00% 28.00%
Calories Not listed 2656 kcal/kg
Calorie density Not listed Low
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Chicken, pea starch, salt, citric acid (preservative), vinegar, mixed tocopherols (preservative), rosemary extract.
Chicken Liver, Wheat Flour, Glycerin, Chicken Meal, Phosphoric Acid, Salt, Potassium Sorbate and Citric Acid and Mixed Tocopherols and Calcium Propionate and BHA (Preservatives), Rosemary Extract Show full list
Limited ingredient Yes No
Health focus Not listed Low fat, Appetite support
Format & suitability
Food type Treat Treat
Texture Soft Chew Soft Chew
Processing Air Dried Slow Cooked
Life stage All Life Stages All Life Stages
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
No Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record KibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear.
None None
Where to buy
Amazon
Amazon Chewy

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Chicken
  • Salt
  • Citric Acid
  • Mixed Tocopherol

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to see Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat and Bil-Jac Slim-Jacs Treats scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat scores higher, 8.2 to 7.5 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science, and no one can pay for a higher score.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Chicken, Salt, Citric Acid, Mixed Tocopherol.

Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?

Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat is not; Bil-Jac Slim-Jacs Treats does not list an AAFCO status.

See the full profiles: Acana Jerky Bites Chicken Recipe Treat and Bil-Jac Slim-Jacs Treats .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.