Skip to content

7,500+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Acana Jerky Bites Duck Recipe Treat Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat

Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat scores higher on KibbleLab, 9.3 to 9.0. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Acana Jerky Bites Duck Recipe Treat and Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Acana Jerky Bites Duck Recipe Treat
Acana Jerky Bites Duck Recipe Treat

Verified Aug 2, 2026

Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat
Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat

Verified Aug 22, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
9.0 / 10 9.3 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
Not listed 35.00%
Fat Not listed 18.00%
Fiber Not listed 0.50%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
8.00% 16.00%
Calories Not listed Not listed
Calorie density Not listed High
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Duck, pea starch, salt, citric acid (preservative), vinegar, mixed tocopherols (preservative), rosemary extract Duck, vegetable glycerin.
Limited ingredient Yes No
Marketed benefits Not listed Allergy support, Sensitive stomach
Format & suitability
Food type Treat Treat
Texture Soft Chew Whole Pieces
Processing Air Dried Not listed
Life stage All Life Stages Puppy
Breed size All Breed Sizes Small
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
No Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No Yes
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record We track the FDA's animal food recall listings back to January 2019 and publish every pet food recall automatically. A filing that isn't pet food may not appear here.
None None
Where to buy

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Duck

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to save favorites and compare foods side by side. Add KL+ to see Acana Jerky Bites Duck Recipe Treat and Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat scores higher, 9.3 to 9.0 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Duck.

Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?

Acana Jerky Bites Duck Recipe Treat is not; Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat does not list an AAFCO status.

See the full profiles: Acana Jerky Bites Duck Recipe Treat and Tuesday's Natural Dog Company 95% Duck Training Bites Treat .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.