Skip to content

6,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats

Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats scores higher on KibbleLab, 7.6 to 7.4. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats and Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats
Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats

Verified Aug 2, 2026

Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats
Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats

Verified Jul 28, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science. No one can pay for a higher score.
7.4 / 10 7.6 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
20.00% 20.00%
Fat 10.00% 12.00%
Fiber 2.00% 1.00%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
30.00% 29.00%
Calories 3124 kcal/kg 3070 kcal/kg
Calorie density Low Low
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Chicken, Wheat Flour, Chicken Meal, Glycerin, Egg, Cheese, Phosphoric Acid, Salt, Potassium Sorbate and Citric Acid and Mixed Tocopherols and Calcium Propionate and BHA (Preservatives), Rosemary Extract, Green Tea Extract, Spearmint Extract Show full list
Chicken, Duck, Rice, Vegetable Glycerin, Sugar, Vinegar, Salt, Natural Flavor, Natural Smoke Flavor, Paprika (for color).
Limited ingredient No No
Format & suitability
Food type Treat Treat
Texture Soft Chew Whole Pieces
Processing Not listed Baked
Life stage All Life Stages Adult
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
Not indicated Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record KibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear.
None None
Where to buy
Amazon Chewy
Amazon Chewy

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Chicken
  • Salt

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to see Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats and Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats scores higher, 7.6 to 7.4 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science, and no one can pay for a higher score.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Chicken, Salt.

See the full profiles: Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats and Blue Buffalo Blue Nudges Jerky Cuts Chicken & Duck Recipe Treats .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.