Skip to content

6,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats

Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats scores higher on KibbleLab, 8.0 to 7.4. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats and Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats
Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats

Verified Aug 2, 2026

Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats
Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats

Verified Jul 19, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
7.4 / 10 8.0 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
20.00% 22.00%
Fat 10.00% 8.00%
Fiber 2.00% 2.50%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
30.00% 18.00%
Calories 3124 kcal/kg 3400 kcal/kg
Calorie density Low Moderate
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Chicken, Wheat Flour, Chicken Meal, Glycerin, Egg, Cheese, Phosphoric Acid, Salt, Potassium Sorbate and Citric Acid and Mixed Tocopherols and Calcium Propionate and BHA (Preservatives), Rosemary Extract, Green Tea Extract, Spearmint Extract Show full list
Chicken, Coconut Glycerin, Ground Grain Sorghum, Gelatin, Salt, Citric Acid (a preservative), Vinegar, Mixed Tocopherols (a preservative), Rosemary Extract
Limited ingredient No Yes
Health focus Not listed Weight management, Digestive health, Bone health, Allergy support
Format & suitability
Food type Treat Treat
Texture Soft Chew Whole Pieces
Processing Not listed Smoked
Life stage All Life Stages All Life Stages
Breed size All Breed Sizes Small
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
Not indicated No
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record KibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear.
None None
Where to buy
Amazon Chewy
Amazon

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Chicken
  • Salt
  • Citric Acid

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to see Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats and Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats scores higher, 8.0 to 7.4 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Chicken, Salt, Citric Acid.

Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?

Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats does not list an AAFCO status; Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats is not.

See the full profiles: Bil-Jac Breakfast Jacs Treats and Jinx Chicken Jerky Bites Treats .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.