Skip to content

6,000+ pet foods rated. Your best match, free in 30 seconds.

Jinx Beef Jerky Tenders Treats Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats

Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats scores higher on KibbleLab, 8.2 to 8.0. Compare ingredients, guaranteed analysis, and AAFCO nutritional adequacy, side by side.

Jinx Beef Jerky Tenders Treats and Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats compared

Nutrients:
As Fed
Jinx Beef Jerky Tenders Treats
Jinx Beef Jerky Tenders Treats

Verified Jul 27, 2026

Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats
Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats

Verified Jul 23, 2026

KibbleLab score The KibbleLab expert rating, 0 to 10, based on published veterinary science.
8.0 / 10 8.2 / 10
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
Protein Guaranteed analysis gives label minimums and maximums, not measured values, shown as fed.
18.00% 20.00%
Fat 17.00% 5.00%
Fiber 2.00% 2.00%
Moisture Higher moisture means a wetter food; it dilutes the other percentages above.
25.00% 22.00%
Calories 2750 kcal/kg Not listed
Calorie density Low Not listed
Ingredients
Full ingredient list Every ingredient on each label, in order of weight.
Beef, Beef Liver, Sorghum, Coconut Glycerin, Salt, Citric Acid, Mixed Tocopherols (natural preservatives). Beef, Coconut glycerin, Brown rice flour, Rolled oats, Guar gum, Flaxseed meal, Rosemary extract
Limited ingredient Yes No
Health focus Weight management, Allergy support High energy
Format & suitability
Food type Treat Treat
Texture Whole Pieces Soft Chew
Processing Smoked Not listed
Life stage All Life Stages All Life Stages
Breed size All Breed Sizes All Breed Sizes
AAFCO nutritional adequacy
Complete & balanced Whether the manufacturer's label claims the food meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for a life stage. Not an independent test.
No Not indicated
Life stages Not listed Not listed
Substantiation How adequacy was established. Feeding trials are the higher bar; formulation means the recipe is calculated to meet the profile.
Not listed Not listed
Maker standards
WSAVA guidelines The World Small Animal Veterinary Association publishes criteria for evaluating a manufacturer: qualified nutritionists on staff, feeding trials, and published research. It does not certify or endorse brands.
No No
PSC accredited The Pet Sustainability Coalition is a nonprofit that accredits pet companies on their environmental and social impact through third-party verification. It reflects sustainability practices, not food quality.
No No
Recalls & where to buy
Recalls on record KibbleLab began logging recalls in July 2026, so earlier recalls may not appear.
None None
Where to buy

Affiliate links · may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Shared ingredients

Both foods list these among their top ingredients, by label weight.

  • Beef
  • Coconut Glycerin

Not sure which is right for your pet?

Sign in free to see Jinx Beef Jerky Tenders Treats and Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats scored for your pet's breed, age, and health focus, save favorites, and compare foods side by side.

Common Questions

Which food scores higher on KibbleLab?

Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats scores higher, 8.2 to 8.0 out of 10. Scores reflect published veterinary science.

Do these two foods share ingredients?

Yes. They share these top ingredients: Beef, Coconut Glycerin.

Are both foods AAFCO complete and balanced?

Jinx Beef Jerky Tenders Treats is not; Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats does not list an AAFCO status.

See the full profiles: Jinx Beef Jerky Tenders Treats and Semi Moist Mini Trainers Beef Semi Moist Mini Trainers Treats .

KibbleLab provides informational content only. This is not veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before changing your pet's diet.

This is a neutral, factual comparison, not a ranking or an endorsement of either product. A food's guaranteed analysis gives legal minimums and maximums for a few nutrients, not measured values. No one can pay for placement or a higher score.

Product details are compiled from public sources and may not reflect the latest formulation. Represent one of these brands? Request a correction. Anyone else can email us.